Sometimes people have PRIORITY to others due to having the right of PRIORITY In conducting a legal action or demanding the fulfilment of right of a certain property. Sometimes the legislator has considered it for some reason for some persons in a particular position. The right of PRIORITY is protected by the legislator, and sometimes it is explicitly forbidden to opposing contract with it. However, the guarantee of this ban, there are disagreements between jurists and lawyers in the cases stated. Some believe conclusion of opposing contract with PRIORITY is void,in contrast, some are considered valid, in the end, others they have chosen the middle solution and they believe that the deal is not affected. In the examples of PRIORITY, the overall conclusion is that opposing contract with PRIORITY is un enforceability to third party,Because these transactions have all the components of the contract, except that there is a barrier to their influence, and that obstacle is the right of PRIORITY of the beneficiary, which, in the event of the subsequent payment of his rights, automatic be valid. Accepting this guarantee solution will not only supply the rights of the rightful owner butalso the rights of the parties.

Complexity of health technologies and increased demands for health care services concomitant with globalization in health care and finite resources have resulted in shortcomings in health delivery and have raised issues regarding equity. Most people experience some sort of denial, delay, deflection, dilution, deterrent, or selection when need health care services and profit is going to be the prevailing variable. Policy makers struggle to circumvent these problems in different ways, none of which prevail across a broad range of health care system. Evidence indicates PRIORITY setting in health care services inevitably requires explicit criteria. A variety of criteria which have been used in different health care system are discussed, focusing on experiences in community participation and APPROACHES for community appraisal. Adopting experience from health care system, and evaluation adapted to respect national values will strengthen the burgeoning health sector reform in Iran. According to worldwide health care principals it seems crucial to establish a regulatory health council to underpin the evidence based PRIORITY setting process in Iran.

Background and aims: Prioritizing research fields prevents waste of budgets and increase efficacy of research. Paying attention to health of employees and workers is necessary for promoting health and sustainable development in the country. Therefore, this study was conducted to determine the research priorities in the field of occupational health in Iran.Methods: The present study was explorative and qualitative research. In order to determine the research priorities in the field of occupational health the COHRED model was used. Data collection was done by review of the literature, obtaining the views of experts (by interview and Delphi technique) and collecting statistics from relevant officials. PRIORITY setting was done in two stages and based on Delphi technique. In this research out of 70 identified research centers, 22 participated in the study. Descriptive statistics including mean (SD) and frequency (percentage) was used to analysis the data.Results: Results of this study showed that musculoskeletal disorders and injuries had the highest research PRIORITY in Iran. The occupation of workers in mine and industries had the highest research PRIORITY. Also three indicators of equity in service provision, work security and healthy life style had the highest research PRIORITY among the social determinants of health for workers.Conclusion: The research was an attempt to identify research priorities in different areas of occupational health research which can be used as a tool for decision makers in distribution of resources.

Present research aimed to identify the needs of IRIPF employees as well as prioritizing their needs. To this aim, 3917 employees throughout the country filled out the need assessment questionnaire.Gathered data analyzed by qui square revealed that different ratio of employees fall into each one of the five need categories (p<0.001). The results also showed a reversed pyramid in which the needs of a higher percentage of employees fell into the higher need categories of self actualization, dignity, and social, whereas; the lower percentage of employees needs PRIORITY had to do with lower needs as safety, and physiological needs.

Green supply chain management has emerged as a proactive approach for improving environmental performance of processes and products in accordance with the requirements of environmental regulations. Various APPROACHES for implementing green supply chain management practices has been proposed and recognized in previous literatures, yet no investigation has identified the reliability and validity of such APPROACHES particularly in electronic industry. This study examines the consistency APPROACHES by factor analysis that determines the adoption and implementation of green supply chain management in Taiwanese electronic industry. The fuzzy analytic hierarchy process method is applied to prioritize the relative importance of four dimensions and twenty APPROACHES among nine enterprises in electronic industry. The findings indicate that these enterprises would emphasize on supplier management performance in the crucial role of implementing green supply chain management. Establishing an environmental database of products, asking for product testing report and top management support are among the most important APPROACHES. The results for the implications of green supply chain management implementation in electronic industry investigated in this work generate a generic hierarchy model for decision-makers who can prioritize those APPROACHES for implementing green supply chain management in Taiwan.

Objective: The importance of the correct selection of advanced technology projects, the importance of sustainable development in the strategic plans of the implementing organizations of such projects, the impressive impact of this technology in all aspects, and the improvement of the quality of human life and the high uncertainty in the environment of such projects, the reason is for addressing this research. Methods: By reviewing the literature and research background, prioritizing high technology projects based on human capital criteria, innovation, project business achievement, economic returns, national influence levels and competitive advantage, quality, demand level, reliability and strategic plans, and project costs Was considered. After reviewing the models and prioritization methods and choosing the type of projects, the preferred structure of output-to-scale output efficiency model was selected in the data envelopment analysis approach as the most comprehensive model in this field. By using the fuzzy hierarchy process analysis, the most important criteria were weighted and ranked. Results: As a result of the implementation of the preferred cost-benefit model of output to output-oriented output scale, among the 30 projects of the Nanotechnology Development Specialized Headquarters, 46. 67% of the projects have been identified as the most PRIORITY projects and suitable for investment. Conclusion: Projects 19, 28, and 7 were the first to third priorities respectively. The projects in the final priorities can according to the template of the specified reference set, become the first priorities for implementation.